in the space between the trees
only emptiness
without emptiness no forest
only emptiness
without emptiness no forest
no forest means no wood
and then what would we do
that's a bit too glib and facile
~~::~~
in the space between the trees
only emptiness
without emptiness no forest
we need forests for the moose
just as the goose needs wetland
more in the right spirit i think but preachy - i'm not delighted
~~::~~
in the space between the trees
only emptiness
without emptiness no forest
echoes in the tree spaces
as moose and goose converse
that might be what i'm looking for
~~::~~::~~::~~
yes ... I think the second was the better ... :-)
ReplyDeletejzb, I'm with you on the last one.
ReplyDelete